Something rather unexpected has happened, and as a result Kingston may be a key player in changing Government regulations.
The story is this: Every year the businesses in the Borough pay a total of £79 million in Business Rates. The money is collected by the Council, so you would imagine that Kingston residents and businesses would reap the benefit.
But no, a whopping £49 million is taken from Kingston and redistributed to other boroughs.
Whilst I do understand the need to support economically deprived areas in the country, this really is out of all proportion. After all, the businesses in Kingston attract up to 500,000 visitors each week - and that puts considerable strain on the 160,000 residents who have to pay for the local services that visitors use or the problems they create (street cleaning, for example).
Worse than that, the thriving economy in Kingston is often used by Government to justify withholding other grants, and, in particular, to keep our annual grant at a minimal level. Although Kingston spends far less per head than other boroughs, its council tax is high because the Government gives us so little.
For many years the Liberal Democrats have been arguing that Kingston should be allowed to keep a higher proportion of Business Rates, so the money can be used to pay for local services.
And at last that may be about to happen.
A couple of years ago some backbenchers introduced the boringly-named Sustainable Communities Bill in Parliament, and to everyone's surprise it got Government backing and became law.
The Act empowers local authorities to claw powers away from central Government. I was very keen that Kingston should grasp this opportunity, so became closely involved in the next stage.
Last year, we went through an intense process of gathering ideas from all corners of the community. 37 proposals were eventually whittled down by the panel of residents to three. They were:
- To overturn the Greenwich judgement - this is the ruling that means that schools like our two grammar schools are not allowed to restrict their intake to borough residents
- To keep a proportion of Business Rates collected - the money would be "ring-fenced for investment in programmes that contribute to local economic, environmental and social sustainability in Kingston"
- To give powers to Councils to license pet shops - this arose from concerns about puppy farming
We're delighted that, thanks to lobbying by MPs and others, the third issue has been taken up by Parliament. You can read more about our local campaign on puppy farming here.
Back to the main story.
The three proposals were sent off to the Local Government Association, who had the task of sifting through proposals from 120 councils. It seems a number of other councils shared our views on Business Rates.
At Full Council on Tuesday I asked the Leader of the Council for an update. He was able to announce that our Business Rate proposal had been shortlisted by the Local Government Association and was being discussed with Ministers.
The end ... no, of course it isn't. We still have to keep the pressure up to ensure that the change is made.
I will report back on progress.